Dear Fools,
Hello again. It is your humble narrator, Azrael. I must apologize for not writing anything yesterday, but circumstances had me at an impasse. So, I shall write today what I had planned to write yesterday, that is, my thoughts on beauty, what is truly beautiful, and society's warped perception of this particular topic. This is probably a rather touchy subject for you all, and I've no doubt that I may make a couple of enemies by writing this, but I also have no doubts that MANY of you will most probably agree for what I'm about to say. Either way suits me. Like I said in my first post, I don't give a damn whether you like me, love me, or think I am just a person who speaks the truth, hate me, despise me, or simply think I am unpleasant... These little discussions and lectures of mine are here for you to think on, and possibly glean some deeper meaning from them. If you don't, that's fine. No skin off my nose.
Now...beauty. What comes to your mind when I say that word? Blue-eyed, blonde haired girls with gigantic tits and waists you can put a hand around? Buff, muscled meat-heads who think with their little shrunken peckers rather with their brains? SAD. PATHETIC. Why is it that society thinks that this is what beauty is? Because the MEDIA is force-feeding it to us, forcing us to believe that we shall only be beautiful if we look like Paris Hilton (Ugh...even TYPING that name makes me want to VOMIT.), or Brad Pitt. Feh. NOT EVERYONE LOOKS LIKE THAT. Nor can everyone EVER look like that, and to think otherwise is sad and stupid. Why, then, have many of us made up our minds that this is what true beauty is? Is it BECAUSE of the media? Is it BECAUSE visions of their interpretations of beauty are force-fed into our psyches on a daily basis? Maybe it's how we were raised. I'm sure that all of you got called ugly at least ONCE during your childhoods. Maybe moreso. So we go looking for things that actually ARE "beautiful." People that others think look "beautiful," and thus we have an impossible thing to aspire to. To look more like Angelina Jolie, or Tom Cruise, or whoever the fuck the people are idolizing nowadays. It's pathetic that because of people's low self-esteems, the media thinks that they can force us to change our views of beauty. The pressing question is, why do we let them? Why do we allow this change to occur? You know, way back when in Victorian London, or even in Civil War America, bigger women were more attractive to men. THAT is why women wore bustles and corsets and layers upon layers of petticoats, so that they could fit in with the aesthetic views of then. Even back THEN people were influenced by their pre/misconception of beauty, and that trend NOTICEABLY goes on till the present. It's not that that influence has changed, it's just that the perception of beauty has changed, and will continue to change. Why, then. would someone be so foolish as to try and be like those people when we KNOW that society's perception of beauty is ever-changing? Aside from being a completely futile task, it's also a COLLOSSAL waste of time, effort, and money.
Now...we have established what society thinks is beautiful, and how the media continues to warp that perception. But what do YOU think is beautiful? I ask this of my precious lost souls, my dear friends, even people who are reading this by accident. If you are a male, think of your ideal female. If you are female, think of your ideal male. I'll give you some time...
Alright. Now if you were a male, I'm sure that your girl had "pantene" hair, legs that went on forever, a nice, shapely butt and some pretty nice, if not outright GIGANTIC, breasts. Sad, men. SAD. Now, I must admit myself of the same fault. I AM sometimes attracted to that particular type of girl, but not all the time. Sometimes I just think that "that type of girl" is a major whore, slut, or whatever. Now, girls. What about your ideal guy? Was he muscly? As handsome as a movie star? Hung like a donkey? UGH. Come on now. That's pathetic. Now, if you are part of the few that did NOT think along these lines, you do have my eternal praise for not being influenced by the media. Why do we think that the aforementioned "types" are attractive? Because we are MADE to think that way, I should wager. Whoever said "beauty is only skin deep" did NOT know the "Plastic Surgery Freaks of Nature" of today. But what about true beauty? Is that only truly skin-deep? What about intelligence? Talent? Personality? Heart? All these things are too esoteric for some, too philosophical to grasp for others, but they are NOT skin deep, and those are BEAUTIFUL qualities.
Now we know that beauty is NOT ALWAYS skin deep, and that clothes do NOT always make the man...but quality of character. Personality. Talent. Because, what if there was a truly beautiful woman before you...but she had NO SUBSTANCE? Same for the girls. What if there was a gorgeous guy that propositioned you for a date, but was as deep as a two-inch rain puddle? How many of you (HORNDOGS NOT INCLUDED) could HONESTLY say that they would even CONSIDER THINKING of going out with them? Or even SLEEPING with them, for that matter? Me? I like a girl with substance. She doesn't necessarily have to be pretty, but she HAS to be at least intelligent enough to keep up with me, she has to be able to make me laugh..and she HAS to be faithful. And SANE. That always helps. Well, I guess that's it for now. Thank you, once again for sticking with me and listening to what I have to say. This concludes tonight's rant. Honestly, this rant could have gone better, but I was strapped for time, and a little lazy. I'll improve on it at a later date.
Oh, to a certain friend of mine? Oh-oh-oooh. Oh-oreo... Oh-oh-oooh. The white stuff. XD YOU know what I mean. XD
~Azrael